Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homocon (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. I won't leave redirect to Log Cabin Republicans, though, since there's nothing on that page that would explain such a redirect. — Scientizzle 17:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
Recreating AFD nomination that TW previously failed to list/tag appropriately... This article is about a neologism that is not notable, with no citations aside from a website called homocon.com and a redlinked individual. AvruchTalk 20:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a great article but it might be salvageable if recast as a top-level article that would fit as a breakout from LGBT_movements_in_the_United_States#American_political_parties.2C_interest_groups_and_LGBT_rights. Something like LGBT politics in the United States Republican Party or Conservative perspectives on LGBT rights (similar to Libertarian perspectives on LGBT rights). That may be too far a reach, though. --Dhartung | Talk 00:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -RiverHockey (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While this article has one legitimate reference, it has little notability. There is already a page on Log Cabin Republicans, suggest the onle legitmate source be used over there. Phyesalis (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Phyesalis rightly points where this should go, Delete and redirect to Log Cabin Republicans. Pastordavid (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.